Concerning the Question of Anthropomorphic Metaphors in Music (Semiotic Aspect)

Elena M. Alkon

Abstract


In this article, the author continues to develop the problem of anthropomorphism in musical thinking, considered through the prism of the opposition of male/female, which serves as the “universal classifier” of mythological modeling (according to Tatiana Tsivyan). Of the rather large number of examples of the male/female anthropomorphic metaphor preserved in the mythopoetics of the peoples of the world, a selection is presented of those that are manifested at different levels of musical thinking. The prevalence of this anthropomorphic metaphor may indicate its deep psychobiological roots and archetypal nature, which ensures its high musical and aesthetic potential, preservation, development and relevance. The widespread modal archetype of the “trichord in a fourth,” represented as a conjugation of greater and lesser spaces (“modal acoustic fields,” for example, D–F and F–G) in the volume of a fourth (D–G) is considered from the point of view of the anthropomorphic metaphor male/female and semantically related fields such as heaven/earth, father/mother. The prevalence of this modal archetype is explained by its correspondence to the “golden proportion,” where the greater is related to the lesser as the whole is to the greater (3/2 = 5/3, in semitones). The most favourable conditions for the manifestation of the continuous properties of the “trichord in a fourth” modal archetype and typologically similar binary-asymmetric structures as the root basis of musical language are noted.

Keywords: semiology of music, anthropomorphism, anthropomorphic metaphor male/female in music, “trichord in fourth” modal archetype as an anthropomorphic metaphor, birthing ritual songs, musical language


Full Text:

PDF

References


Yusupova L.G. The human factor in language. Kazanskaya nauka. 2022, no. 4, pp. 199–200. (In Russ.)

Medushevsky V.V. Intonational form of music. Moscow: Kompozitor Publ., 1993. 268 p. (In Russ.)

Cox A. Music and Embodied Cognition: Listening, Moving, Feeling, and Thinking. Bloomington; Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 2016. viii, 288 p. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt200610s

Alkon E.M. Music thinking of East and West — continuity and discontinuity: A study. Vladivostok: Far Eastern University Publ., 1999. 126 p. (In Russ.)

Lotman Yu.M. The phenomenon of culture. In: Semiotics of culture: works on sign systems 10. Uchenye zapiski Tartuskogo universiteta. 1978, issue 463, pp. 3–17. (In Russ.)

Gertsman E.V. Music of Ancient Greece and Rome. St. Petersburg: Aleteiya Publ., 1995. 336 p. (In Russ.)

Sisauri V.I. Ceremonial music of China and Japan. St. Petersburg: Saint Petersburg State University Publ., 2008. 292 p. (In Russ.)

Klyuchko S.I. China’s traditional musical writing (psychological aspect). Musicology. 2008, no. 5, pp. 62‒67. (In Russ.)

Tsivyan T.V. The male/female opposition and its classificating role in model of the world. In: Ethnic stereotypes of male and female behavior. St. Petersburg: Nauka Publ., 1991, pp. 77–91. (In Russ.)

Kurth E. Grundlagen des linearen Kontrapunkts. Einführung in Stil und Technik von Bach’s melodischer Polyphonie. Bern: Akademische Buchhandlung von Max Drechsel, 1917. 525 p.

Cheboksarov N.N., Cheboksarova I.A. Peoples. Races. Cultures. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 1985. 271 p. (In Russ.)

Alkon E.M. Classification of mode archetypes and modern problems of music education. Musical Art and Education. 2019, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 77–95. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31862/2309-1428-2019-7-2-77-95

Alkon E.M. Binary asymmetries of “life formula” in music: coincidence or pattern? Journal of Asymmetry. 2015, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 26‒38. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18454/ASY.2015.34.734

Dashieva L.D. The trichord as modal archetype in traditional Buryat music. Traditional culture. 2024, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 64‒75. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26158/TK.2024.25.3.005

Mamcheva N.A. The world of Ainu music: Monograph: in 2 parts. Part 2. Melodies and texts. Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk: Ostrovnaya Biblioteka Publ., 2025. 608 p. (In Russ.)

Pesina S. Anthropomorphic metaphors as a cognitive model for the conventionalization of thought. Technology and Language. 2023, vol. 4, issue 4, pp. 22‒33. https://doi.org/10.48417/technolang.2023.04.03

Zemtsovsky I.I. Anthropology of musical existence. A book of the universal. St. Petersburg: Kompozitor Publ., 2003. 592 p. (In Russ.)

Zemtsovsky I.I. Melodica of calendar songs. Leningrad: Muzyka Publ., 1975. 224 p. (In Russ.)

Mithen S. The Singing Neanderthals: The Origin of Music, Language, Mind and Body. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson Publ., 2005. 374 p.

Jan S. Music in Evolution and Evolution in Music. Cambridge: Open Book Publ., 2022. 806 p. https://doi.org/10.11647/OBP.0301

Killin A. Book review: Steven Jan, Music in evolution and evolution in music. Musicae Scientiae. 2024, vol. 28, issue 4, pp. 827‒831. https://doi.org/10.1177/10298649241228898

Hamilton A. The evolution of music: human and non-human. Music and Letters. 2025, vol. 10, no. 3. https://doi.org/10.1093/ml/gcaf028/8119703

Tarasti E. The panorama of musical semiotics and one new theory to elaborate it further. The paradigm of existential theory in music. MusiMid. 2020, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 11‒35.

Kull K. The biosemiotic fundamentals of aesthetics: beauty is the perfect semiotic fitting. Biosemiotics. 2022, vol. 15, pp. 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-022-09476-w

Slayton M.A., Hendlin Y.H. The musical turn in biosemiotics. Biosemiotics. 2023, vol. 16, pp. 221–237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-023-09532-z




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.56620/RM.2025.4.145-153

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.