“New Ballet Criticism” (1993–2003) About “Soviet” Ballet: Forms of Cultural Recycling

Lyubov A. Kupets

Abstract


In post-Soviet Russia ballet criticism, similar to opera criticism, has an almost 30-year-old history, but the period perceived as the brightest and most significant is the first period, spanning the 1990s and the early part of the first decade of the 21st century. For this New Ballet Criticism (as it has been labelled by Vadim Gaevsky), as a part of New Russian Music Criticism (as defined by Olga Manulkina and Pavel Gershenzon), a number of features have become normative: provocative styles and titles, a demythologization of works and of choreographers, the use of comparisons with mass culture in narratives, and ironic subtext. Similar to opera, political discourse has become important in ballet receptions of that time.

Reviews of Soviet-era ballet productions (as well as other types of performance) often refer to the main elements of Soviet mass art — Soviet films, as well as symbols of the totalitarian culture, such as sculpture and ideological materials. The styles and headlines exploit numerous Sovietisms that are familiar and recognizable by the audience. Just like in opera reviews, the recent “Soviet” element in ballet receptions is synthesized with Soviet mass culture and fashionable trends in the country via the cult of Western cinema and the influence of domestic and foreign literary, scholarly and epistolary texts. 

But unlike opera criticism, ballet narratives clearly record the diversity of genres of “Soviet” ballet (ranking Sergei Prokofiev and Dmitri Shostakovich among them); ballets since 1961 have been interpreted as a transformation of the “Soviet” element under the influence of George Balanchine’s choreography; the concept of “Soviet choreography” also implies the unreachable, for example, in the embodiment of heroic moods and the creation of mass scenes. Four forms of cultural recycling in ballet receptions are identified: recycling, recycling à la ballet, double recycling and quasi-recycling.

Keywords: ballet, New Russian music criticism, new ballet criticism, receptions, cultural recycling, Soviet culture, Pavel Gershenzon, content analysis

Full Text:

PDF

References


Andrianova M. D. Industrial Novel and Contemporary Russian Literature (Towards the Issue of the Recycling of the Genre). Russkaya literatura. 2023. No. 1, pp. 245–256. (In Russ.)

DOI: 10.31860/0131-6095-2023-1-245-256

Zhurkova D. A. Recycling of the Soviet Estrada in The Voice Television Show. The Art and Science of Television. 2023. No. 19 (2), pp. 41‒107. (In Eng. and in Russ.) DOI: 10.30628/1994-9529-2023-19.2-41-107

Kupets L. A. Boris Asafyev as a Cultural Hero (Based on the Materials of the “Soviet Music” / “Music Academy” Journal). Music Academy. 2023. No. 1, pp. 38–57. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.34690/288

Maslinskaya S. G. To Forget to Remember (Memory of the Pioneer-Heroes in the 21st Century). Siberian Historical Research. 2021. No. 4, pp. 138‒159. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.17223/2312461X/34/10

Marchenko T. V. Cultural Recycling of the Soviet in Internet Memes: Semiotic Linguistic Interpretation. Humanities and Law Research. 2022. Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 505–518. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.37493/2409-1030.2022.3.17

Sekushina Yu. A. Imagining the Past, Transforming the Present: Cultural Recycling of the Soviet Past in the Discourse of Conscious Consumption. Siberian Historical Research. 2021. No. 4, pp. 160‒182. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.17223/2312461X/34/11

Kupets L. A. Russian Wikipedia vs Great Russian Encyclopedia: (Re)construction of Soviet Music in the Post-Soviet Internet Space. Problemy muzykal'noi nauki / Music Scholarship. 2021. No. 2, pp. 156–169. DOI: 10.33779/2587-6341.2021.2.156-169

Kupets L. A. Opera Criticism in Russia in the Early 21st Century: Constructing the (Non-) Soviet Style. Problemy muzykal'noi nauki / Music Scholarship. 2020. No. 3, pp. 114–127. DOI: 10.33779/2587-6341.2020.3.114-127




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.56620/2782-3598.2023.4.022-034

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.