Digital Art and the Future of Traditional Arts
Abstract
Ever since the invention of communication technology, which was then followed by the
invention of the internet, the two apparatuses have become a very important part of our daily life.
For many of us, it feels like something is missing when we do not have a look at social media
during a particular day, either in search of news, a message from friends or relatives, or otherwise
when we would like to send a post to our social media account. This developed into a phenomenon
called the Internet of Things (IoT), which denotes everything about physical items communicating
with each other. Machine-to-machine communications and person-to-computer communications
are extended to inanimate objects. Indeed, ubiquity networks do exist everywhere, and with the aid
of the modern computer, which has become so speedy and powerful in its work, they are opening
up the road to the revolution of IoT (simply known as Revolution 4.0), which then signifies the
beginning of the future generation of the internet.
This article forms a descriptive study of the presence of digital art, which has been signified by
three extraordinary occurrences, i.e., the presence of the world of art as based on Virtual Reality
(VR), the principles of digital art for everybody, and the future which is expected to be signified
by artistic creativity based on tech-enabled availability. All of these three phenomena are discussed
here for the sake of achieving an understanding of the generic multidimensional space, since this
article does not intend to lead us to the specific meaning of digital art and its implications for the
development of aesthetic values. Furthermore, this article does not assume to provide any theory
of criticism whatsoever. The result of this study is simply to show how technological disruption in
the world of art, including art education and its effects on the traditional arts, has become a constant
topic of discourse in academic society.
Keywords: Digital Art, Virtual Reality, Traditional Arts.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Barron, Stephen. Project Notes for the Sym Choon Gallery Show. Telstra Adelaide Festival, Stuart, Mealing (Ed.). Computer and Art. 2nd Edition. Portland, OR: Intellect Books, 1996, pp. 103–105.
Baudrillard, Jean. Andy Warhol: Snobbish Machine. Julian Pefanis (trans.). Impossible Presence: Surface and Screen in the Photogenic Era. Smith, Terry (Ed.). Chicago, IL: The University Chicago Press, 2001, pp. 183–192.
Bohm, David. Wholeness and the Implicate Order. London, UK: Ark Paperbacks (Routledge), 1980. 281 p.
Burton, Ed. Representing Representation: Artificial Intelligence and Drawing. Mealing, Stuart. (Ed.). Computer and Art. Exeter: Intellect Books. 2nd Edition. Portland, OR: Intellect Books, 1997, pp. 33–49.
Canguilhem, George. Machine and Organism. J. Carry and S. Kwinter (Eds.). Incorporations. New York: Zone 6 Publications, 1992, pp. 44–69.
Clynes, Manfred E. & Kline, Nathan S. Cyborgs and Space. Austronautics: Journal of Science. Edition September 1960, pp. 29–33.
Colin, Cheery. (3rd Edition). On Human Communication: A Review, a Survey, and a Criticism. Cambridge, UK: MIT Press, 1980. 392 p.
Cope, David. Virtual Music: Computer Synthesis of Musical Style. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press., 2001. 551 p.
Falzon, Christopher. Philosophy Goes to the Movies: An Introduction to Philosophy. London, and New York: Routledge, 2002. 225 p.
Gilchrist, Alasdair. Industry 4.0: The Industrial Internet of Things. Distributed by New York, NY, 2013: Springer, 2016. 259 p.
Grady, Sean M. Virtual Reality: Simulating and Enhancing the World with Computers. New York: Facts on File, Inc. New Edition, 2003. 215 p.
Hofstadter, Douglas. Gödel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid. New York: Basic Books, 1999. 821 p.
Jefferies, Janis. Blurring the Boundaries: Performance, Technology and the Artificial Sublime – An Interview with Ruth Gibson and Bruno Martelli. Interfaces of Performance. Chapter Three. Chatzichristodoulou, Maria, Jefferies, Janis, & Zerihan, Rachel (Eds.). Surrey, England: Ashgate Publishing Limited, 2009, pp. 43–56.
Lanier, J., & Biocca, F. An insider’s view of the Future of Virtual Reality. Journal of Communication. 1992. No. 42, 4, pp. 150–172.
Lee, Newton. From a Pin-up Girl to Star Trek’s Holodeck: Artificial Intelligence and Cyborgs. Digital Da Vinci: Computers in the Arts and Sciences. New York: Springer, 2014, pp. 1–21.
Meyer, David. IBM ‘neuron’ chips mimic brain processing. ZDNet. [Online] August 18, 2011. URL: http://www.zdnet.com/ibm-neuron-chips-mimic-brain-processing-3040093720/ (10.12.2020).
Mukhopadhyay, Subhas Candra (Ed.). Internet of Things: Challenges and Opportunities. Internet of Things: Challenges and Opportunities. New York: Springer, 2014, pp. 1–17.
Myers, Andrew. Stanford’s John McCarthy, Seminal Figure of Artificial Intelligence, Dies at 84. Stanford News Report. Octiober 25, 2011.
Poster, Mark. Postmodern Virtualities. Cyberspace, Cyberbodies, Cyberpunk: Cultures of Technological Embodiment. Featherstone, Mike and Roger Burrows, Roger (Eds.). London, UK: SAGE Publications, 2000, pp. 108–136.
Reffin-Smith, Brian. Post-modern Art, or: Virtual Reality as Trojan Donkey, or: Horsetail Tartan Literature Groin Arts. Computers and Art. Stuart Mealing (Ed.), Bristol: Intellect Books, 1997, pp. 127–138.
Russonello, Giovanni. The Unfinished Work of Alan Lomax’s Global Jukebox. Critic’s Notebook. The New York Times, 11 July, 2017.
Scriverner, Stephen. & Clement, Wayne. Triangulating Artworlds: Gallery, New Media and Academy. Art Practice in a Digital Culture. Gardiner, Hazel & Gere, Charlie (Eds.). Chapter Two. Surrey, England: Ashgate Publishing Limited, 2010, pp. 9–35.
Shusterman, Richard. Performing Live: Aesthetic Alternatives for the End of Art. London: Cornell University Press, 2000. 259 p.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33779/2587-6341.2021.1.096-110
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.